<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon fires back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://codepoet5150.com/2008/09/17/canon-fires-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://codepoet5150.com/2008/09/17/canon-fires-back/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, photography, coding, music</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 05:11:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nir</title>
		<link>http://codepoet5150.com/2008/09/17/canon-fires-back/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nir]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 10:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codepoet5150.wordpress.com/?p=341#comment-60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I’d like to see them make a G10 with half the resolution but twice (or more) the low-light capabilities — that would be useful.&quot;

how about leaving the 15mb resolution and just improving the high iso performance?
http://niralon.wordpress.com/2008/11/27/its-almost-there/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’d like to see them make a G10 with half the resolution but twice (or more) the low-light capabilities — that would be useful.&#8221;</p>
<p>how about leaving the 15mb resolution and just improving the high iso performance?<br />
<a href="http://niralon.wordpress.com/2008/11/27/its-almost-there/" rel="nofollow">http://niralon.wordpress.com/2008/11/27/its-almost-there/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: codepoet5150</title>
		<link>http://codepoet5150.com/2008/09/17/canon-fires-back/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[codepoet5150]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codepoet5150.wordpress.com/?p=341#comment-36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, they&#039;re not.  They&#039;re marketed as a point &amp; shoot w/ D-SLR features.  It has some higher-end features of an SLR not normally found in a point &amp; shoot like a hot shoe for a flash, and you can shoot RAW.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, they&#8217;re not.  They&#8217;re marketed as a point &amp; shoot w/ D-SLR features.  It has some higher-end features of an SLR not normally found in a point &amp; shoot like a hot shoe for a flash, and you can shoot RAW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: everydayman</title>
		<link>http://codepoet5150.com/2008/09/17/canon-fires-back/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[everydayman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codepoet5150.wordpress.com/?p=341#comment-35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not really sure about this, but are those Canon G-series considered D-SLR&#039;s already? ... I don&#039;t sem to know much about the differences. Maybe it&#039;s the lenses. 

http://3critical.wordpress.com/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not really sure about this, but are those Canon G-series considered D-SLR&#8217;s already? &#8230; I don&#8217;t sem to know much about the differences. Maybe it&#8217;s the lenses. </p>
<p><a href="http://3critical.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://3critical.wordpress.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

